The inclusion of the primary and secondary cones-of-vision are very helpful. The provide an insight into what portion of the plan/section is "accurate" based on the perspective and what portion is "speculative". What I am interested in, primarily, is the speculative area. And why you chose to render/complete it the way you did. Please explain.
(I like option 2 - i.e. the room is ONLY to the extents of the view.)
1 comment:
The inclusion of the primary and secondary cones-of-vision are very helpful. The provide an insight into what portion of the plan/section is "accurate" based on the perspective and what portion is "speculative". What I am interested in, primarily, is the speculative area. And why you chose to render/complete it the way you did. Please explain.
(I like option 2 - i.e. the room is ONLY to the extents of the view.)
Post a Comment